In our latest podcast episode, Weaveworks CTO Cornelia Davis leads an insightful and very lively discussion with some of the founding members and active contributors of the GitOps Working Group (GWG). The focus of the GWG, a working group under the CNCF App Delivery SIG, is to clearly define a vendor-neutral, principle-led meaning of GitOps. The goal however is to express a foundation for interoperability between tools, conformance, and certification.
All of our 6 podcast guests have extensive working knowledge of GitOps, from the way it came into being to the way their customers are putting it to work today:
- Brice Fernandes, Senior Solutions Architect, Weaveworks
- Christian Hernandez, Senior Principal Technical Marketing Manager, Red Hat
- Chris Patterson, Staff Product Manager, GitHub
- Chris Sanders, Program Manager, Microsoft
- Dan Garfield, Chief Open Source Officer, CodeFresh
- Jesse Butler, Senior Developer Advocate, Kubernetes team AWS
Talking points range from defining GitOps to what its underlying principles are and why we are seeing a steadily growing number of practitioners.
You can listen to the podcast in full below – or read on for a summary of the key points.
Haven’t we already defined GitOps?
Like all successful technologies, GitOps has now been around so long, it can be defined in many different ways. But in short, it’s an operating model for distributed applications that increases engineering velocity without compromising stability or security. It does this by using Git to store all operations information – essentially a description with which the system (the application and its infrastructure) must adhere to at all times. And to achieve this, you need a declarative system on which to base your infrastructure – which is where Kubernetes comes in.
Agreeing on first principles
Now let’s take a step back – and look at what the underlying principles of GitOps actually are. Obviously there are some key technologies required to put it into practice, namely Kubernetes and Git. But according to the participants in the podcast, there are certain key characteristics that need to be in place for you to truthfully say: this thing we’re doing here, it’s GitOps. So what are they?
1) A desired state as expressed in a declarative system
This is about the ‘single source of truth’ – essentially, keeping a description of the entire system in one place, so you’ve got something to compare the production version against.
As Weaveworks’ Brice Fernandes puts it, "that means a system that's managed by GitOps must have its desired state completely expressed declaratively as data and that should be readable and writable by both machines and humans."
2) Immutable versions of that desired state
You can’t rewrite history. Everything gets recorded and nobody can go back and make changes to previous versions of the system. This way, you know that if (or, rather, when) you need to roll back, you’re rolling back to something that definitely worked. In Brice’s words, “versions should be immutable, and you should retain a complete version of history so that there's no history rewrites.” The group went on to discuss how this really gets to the heart of what GitOps is all about.
3) Continuous state reconciliation
GitOps isn’t just about Git and Kubernetes. It relies on additional software agents to monitor what’s running in production, checking for any drift from the version described in Git. If they don’t like what they see, that’s when they start to fire off alerts.
“The fact that the system state is automatically maintained by the reconciliation agents to reduce system draft is something that we've been doing within various aspects of Microsoft for quite a while. And the fact that it really helps with developer productivity. Developers can focus on code rather than, you know, the actual, the systems themselves and also the security aspect.”
– Chris Sanders, Program Manager, Microsoft
4) Operations through declaration
The last principle the group agreed on was the idea that in GitOps, absolutely all operations actions are performed declaratively – meaning that nothing can be done unless it is done through Git. Without this, the integrity of the system would be compromised.
As Cornelia Davis summarises, “Git is the interface to operations. The principle of operations through declaration says, that's how you do ops. You don't go into clicky, clicky interfaces, or scripts, or some other APIs. It is through changes to that declarative state.”
Or as Jesse Butler, Senior Developer Advocate, Kubernetes team AWS puts it, “How do you get to the ops part? And that's really, to me, the fundamental change over the last couple of years... we have the automation integrated with the deployment environment. That's the ideal implementation. So now we're looking at something internal inside of the distributed system, inside the complex system, which is actually monitoring for changes to itself. Pulling those changes and applying those changes based on the desired state, which is in version control, which is immutable. So this is really the sort of paradigm shift for me.”
The GitOps Working Group is looking to grow its community and wants your help - if you are interested in participating, please visit the Github repo. There are a few ways you can get involved:
- Watch or star the repo to see when things change
- Join the GitOps Subreddit
- Attend a Working Group or Committee meeting
- Open an issue and let us know how you're using GitOps and any important considerations we should include
- Join #wg-gitops on CNCF Slack
- Join the SIG App Delivery mailing list, and watch or participate in topics prefixed with [gitops-wg]
- See Working Group project boards for status of work, or for ideas on areas that could use additional participation
- Volunteer to join committees and help with projects according to your interest and ability
To be notified of future episodes: